<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Take on Lightroom 3 Beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lightroomers.com/my-take-on-lightroom-3-beta/662/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lightroomers.com/my-take-on-lightroom-3-beta/662/</link>
	<description>Lightroom tutorials, tips and training for Lightroomers!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 08:13:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://lightroomers.com/my-take-on-lightroom-3-beta/662/comment-page-1/#comment-1536</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 01:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightroomers.com/?p=662#comment-1536</guid>
		<description>The final release of Lightroom 3 will upgrade Lightroom 2 catalogs (and Lightroom 1 catalogs too).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The final release of Lightroom 3 will upgrade Lightroom 2 catalogs (and Lightroom 1 catalogs too).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete Thornton</title>
		<link>http://lightroomers.com/my-take-on-lightroom-3-beta/662/comment-page-1/#comment-1535</link>
		<dc:creator>pete Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 21:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightroomers.com/?p=662#comment-1535</guid>
		<description>when LR3 finally is finally released, how will i get it to see all my LR 2 work / catalogs??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when LR3 finally is finally released, how will i get it to see all my LR 2 work / catalogs??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LW</title>
		<link>http://lightroomers.com/my-take-on-lightroom-3-beta/662/comment-page-1/#comment-1511</link>
		<dc:creator>LW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightroomers.com/?p=662#comment-1511</guid>
		<description>For selective editing, check out NIK software.  I will be upgrading to Lr3 when it is launched but there are lots of great plug-ins out there that add functionality.  For people are ticked off b/c such functionality isn&#039;t already in Lr, meditate on Don Quixote awhile.  The fact is Lr3 WILL be the 800 lb. gorilla on the block and everyone [other than Aperture fanboys(people)] will be using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For selective editing, check out NIK software.  I will be upgrading to Lr3 when it is launched but there are lots of great plug-ins out there that add functionality.  For people are ticked off b/c such functionality isn&#8217;t already in Lr, meditate on Don Quixote awhile.  The fact is Lr3 WILL be the 800 lb. gorilla on the block and everyone [other than Aperture fanboys(people)] will be using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John.B</title>
		<link>http://lightroomers.com/my-take-on-lightroom-3-beta/662/comment-page-1/#comment-1470</link>
		<dc:creator>John.B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightroomers.com/?p=662#comment-1470</guid>
		<description>Reviving an old thread, since it was recently bumped:

&gt;&gt; re #4: Noise reduction is applied to the entire image, just like it is in LR2, but the rendering is greatly improved. Noise reduction control via the Adjustment Brush would indeed be a great feature!

FWIW, that would be huge.  The noise reduction I might use on skin tones might be completely different than the noise reduction I would want to use on a background.  Not just different levels of NR, but different types of NR.

&gt;&gt; What application do you use that applies noise reduction selectively to only parts of an image?

Look at how Aperture 3 does this with their brushes tool, esp. the &quot;detect edges&quot; feature.  That sort of paradigm but with exposure, white balance, noise reduction, the works.

&gt;&gt; Would you be supportive of improvements to the noise reduction functionality if it did a better job of protecting the “good” areas while correcting the “bad”?

What I need is the ability to mask off layers inside Lr for selective corrections.  Without going to Ps and back (and rendering a PSD on top of the raw).  I&#039;m not asking to be able to do Ps stuff like cloning an image, just to be able to create layers (or an approximation) that I can use to selectively adjust, etc.  Maybe on a hard edge, maybe feathered...

Basically, anything I can do with Lr I&#039;d like the control to be able to do to just a selected part of an image at potentially even to the pixel level.  Not just a spray can tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reviving an old thread, since it was recently bumped:</p>
<p>&gt;&gt; re #4: Noise reduction is applied to the entire image, just like it is in LR2, but the rendering is greatly improved. Noise reduction control via the Adjustment Brush would indeed be a great feature!</p>
<p>FWIW, that would be huge.  The noise reduction I might use on skin tones might be completely different than the noise reduction I would want to use on a background.  Not just different levels of NR, but different types of NR.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt; What application do you use that applies noise reduction selectively to only parts of an image?</p>
<p>Look at how Aperture 3 does this with their brushes tool, esp. the &#8220;detect edges&#8221; feature.  That sort of paradigm but with exposure, white balance, noise reduction, the works.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt; Would you be supportive of improvements to the noise reduction functionality if it did a better job of protecting the “good” areas while correcting the “bad”?</p>
<p>What I need is the ability to mask off layers inside Lr for selective corrections.  Without going to Ps and back (and rendering a PSD on top of the raw).  I&#8217;m not asking to be able to do Ps stuff like cloning an image, just to be able to create layers (or an approximation) that I can use to selectively adjust, etc.  Maybe on a hard edge, maybe feathered&#8230;</p>
<p>Basically, anything I can do with Lr I&#8217;d like the control to be able to do to just a selected part of an image at potentially even to the pixel level.  Not just a spray can tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://lightroomers.com/my-take-on-lightroom-3-beta/662/comment-page-1/#comment-1469</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightroomers.com/?p=662#comment-1469</guid>
		<description>Hi Jere, Take a look at this article:

http://www.peachpit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1191969</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jere, Take a look at this article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.peachpit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1191969" rel="nofollow">http://www.peachpit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1191969</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jere Carroll</title>
		<link>http://lightroomers.com/my-take-on-lightroom-3-beta/662/comment-page-1/#comment-1468</link>
		<dc:creator>jere Carroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightroomers.com/?p=662#comment-1468</guid>
		<description>I saw in your article about backing up the lightroom catalog that adobe assumes you will already have a backup process for your photos folder.  Any hints as to how to do this with out the use of time machine on a mac?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw in your article about backing up the lightroom catalog that adobe assumes you will already have a backup process for your photos folder.  Any hints as to how to do this with out the use of time machine on a mac?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://lightroomers.com/my-take-on-lightroom-3-beta/662/comment-page-1/#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 03:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightroomers.com/?p=662#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>Actually, all you need is the latest version of Lightroom 2, which is now 2.6:

http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates/

Lightroom 2.6 supports the G11, but the LR3 Beta does not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, all you need is the latest version of Lightroom 2, which is now 2.6:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates/" rel="nofollow">http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates/</a></p>
<p>Lightroom 2.6 supports the G11, but the LR3 Beta does not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB</title>
		<link>http://lightroomers.com/my-take-on-lightroom-3-beta/662/comment-page-1/#comment-1425</link>
		<dc:creator>MB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightroomers.com/?p=662#comment-1425</guid>
		<description>Question: I have LR2. I would prefer not to lod the whole LR3Beta, but rather prefer to wait until the actual version comes out. In the meantime I&#039;m shooting RAW files with my Canon G11 that LR can&#039;t read. Is here a way to take/load a piece of LR3Beta so that LR2 recognizes them? Help! Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question: I have LR2. I would prefer not to lod the whole LR3Beta, but rather prefer to wait until the actual version comes out. In the meantime I&#8217;m shooting RAW files with my Canon G11 that LR can&#8217;t read. Is here a way to take/load a piece of LR3Beta so that LR2 recognizes them? Help! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://lightroomers.com/my-take-on-lightroom-3-beta/662/comment-page-1/#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightroomers.com/?p=662#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>i want tethered shooting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want tethered shooting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://lightroomers.com/my-take-on-lightroom-3-beta/662/comment-page-1/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightroomers.com/?p=662#comment-989</guid>
		<description>I would choose to buy Lightroom 2 now (then free upgrade to 2.5). We don&#039;t know when the full version of Lightroom 3 will be released. Lightroom 3 Beta is not feature complete and while it has some improvements over 2.5 I find 2.5 to be a more reliable tool for the job for now. In the past, the catalog from the current version will be upgradable to the next, so everything you do in Lightroom 2 will transfer to Lightroom 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would choose to buy Lightroom 2 now (then free upgrade to 2.5). We don&#8217;t know when the full version of Lightroom 3 will be released. Lightroom 3 Beta is not feature complete and while it has some improvements over 2.5 I find 2.5 to be a more reliable tool for the job for now. In the past, the catalog from the current version will be upgradable to the next, so everything you do in Lightroom 2 will transfer to Lightroom 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

